|
Post by Admin on Oct 15, 2013 14:02:28 GMT -5
Cross-post from AnonNews
September 18, 2013
The MANBOD is Norman Bates The Rule Book (CC&Rs) is Norman Bates mother SLR is the Bates Motel Norman feels that his mother still exists since he's placed her in a rocking chair instead of in the ground. Norman cannot face the reality his mother is deceased and continues to listen to what Norman interprets as a valid and controlling voice. Others see Norman Bates (manbod) as PSYCHO _______________________________________________ ^^^^^Brilliant!^^^^^^^ __________________________________________ Impressive insight and amusing analogy. _________________________________________________-- September 18, 2013
On the Deadbook Rules:
In the case of SLR, the above post on Norman Bates/MANBOD is on the money. "Perception is Reality" is SLohA's operating legal status. Norman is obviously listening to the voices in his head which have become his guiding perception of the real world. In the same way, MANBOD clings to the perception of a legitimate HOA existence.
As long as there is group participation in Norman's world, there will still be irrational rules and an Undead Deadbook. (Actually, for a number of lots in here, the Deadbook is still the Redbook.) Global recognition of a dead Redbook would be way beyond the readiness of Norman to recognize (or to the SLR owners).
Until Norman goes into therapy or Norman's mother tells him otherwise, "consensus reality" will reign in SLR and we will continue to act as if we have an HOA that has authority to offer a ballot and make a new rule. We will pretend. ______________________________________________________ September 19, 2013
if everything is indeed just pretense, then maybe we should just pretend to pay our fees
|
|
The Central Scrutinizer
Guest
|
Post by The Central Scrutinizer on Dec 16, 2013 7:05:14 GMT -5
MangeBod has worked themselves into an Imaginary Frenzy during the fade out of their Imaginary Authority....
They begin to feel depressed now They know the end is near....
They have realized that Imaginary Rule Books and Imaginary Amendments only exist in the Imagination of the Imaginers and that no one gives a hoot anyway....
So they go back into their ugly little Imagination and dream of their Imaginary worth to the Community.....
|
|
|
Post by BagLady on Dec 16, 2013 17:55:05 GMT -5
Poetic and imaginative!
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Lie Detector on Dec 21, 2013 10:18:17 GMT -5
Here is a new one ! JC (maint. Foreman) has been telling residents that the area behind the Storage Lot/Maint, Yard fence is a "FIRE LANE".
Since this MANBOD is intent on lying to any and all residents and have been caught lying many many times I felt Mr. Lie Detector should donate some time and do a little fact finding to get to the truth . Here is what I did......
I got in my truck and drove to the Fire Station on SR-60 and went inside I asked a EMS Technician if it would be possible to speak with the LT, the answer was "Have a seat and I'll get him" I chatted with the Station Supervisor about the area in question and the LT said this was the first he had heard of this area being a Fire Lane. He went on to say the Fire Dept. inspects and installs signage in Fire Lanes and since the area in question has been part of SLR since SLR opened and it HAS NOT had signs installed by the Fire MarsH all it is not a fire lane. AND that any Fire/Rescue Vehicle would not proceed into a marsh area due to the fact it could become mired down and would place the vehicle and personnel "Out of Service."
|
|
Anonymous Environmentalist
Guest
|
Post by Anonymous Environmentalist on Dec 22, 2013 7:19:29 GMT -5
Here is a new one ! JC (maint. Foreman) has been telling residents that the area behind the Storage Lot/Maint, Yard fence is a "FIRE LANE". Since this MANBOD is intent on lying to any and all residents and have been caught lying many many times I felt Mr. Lie Detector should donate some time and do a little fact finding to get to the truth . Here is what I did...... I got in my truck and drove to the Fire Station on SR-60 and went inside I asked a EMS Technician if it would be possible to speak with the LT, the answer was "Have a seat and I'll get him" I chatted with the Station Supervisor about the area in question and the LT said this was the first he had heard of this area being a Fire Lane. He went on to say the Fire Dept. inspects and installs signage in Fire Lanes and since the area in question has been part of SLR since SLR opened and it HAS NOT had signs installed by the Fire MarsH all it is not a fire lane. AND that any Fire/Rescue Vehicle would not proceed into a marsh area due to the fact it could become mired down and would place the vehicle and personnel "Out of Service." This regime believes it's ok to keep residents in check with their endless supply of PURE CRAP--and the funny thing about it is the fact that they got JC running around barking orders at other residents like he's some sort of resort police. He's one of the biggest liars and hypocrites in here, but, because he's acting on behalf of his boss, that makes it all o.k.
|
|
|
Post by BagLady on Dec 22, 2013 14:46:17 GMT -5
Here is a new one ! JC (maint. Foreman) has been telling residents that the area behind the Storage Lot/Maint, Yard fence is a "FIRE LANE". Since this MANBOD is intent on lying to any and all residents and have been caught lying many many times I felt Mr. Lie Detector should donate some time and do a little fact finding to get to the truth . Here is what I did...... I got in my truck and drove to the Fire Station on SR-60 and went inside I asked a EMS Technician if it would be possible to speak with the LT, the answer was "Have a seat and I'll get him" I chatted with the Station Supervisor about the area in question and the LT said this was the first he had heard of this area being a Fire Lane. He went on to say the Fire Dept. inspects and installs signage in Fire Lanes and since the area in question has been part of SLR since SLR opened and it HAS NOT had signs installed by the Fire MarsH all it is not a fire lane. AND that any Fire/Rescue Vehicle would not proceed into a marsh area due to the fact it could become mired down and would place the vehicle and personnel "Out of Service." This regime believes it's ok to keep residents in check with their endless supply of PURE CRAP--and the funny thing about it is the fact that they got JC running around barking orders at other residents like he's some sort of resort police. He's one of the biggest liars and hypocrites in here, but, because he's acting on behalf of his boss, that makes it all o.k. Here's an aerial photo of JC's Firelane--it's the buffer behind the fence in back of Maintenance/Storage. (Use the saddleviewer/abc123 to enlarge it or download.)
|
|
|
Post by Call me Crazy on Dec 22, 2013 16:04:44 GMT -5
This regime believes it's ok to keep residents in check with their endless supply of PURE CRAP--and the funny thing about it is the fact that they got JC running around barking orders at other residents like he's some sort of resort police. He's one of the biggest liars and hypocrites in here, but, because he's acting on behalf of his boss, that makes it all o.k. Here's an aerial photo of JC's Firelane--it's the buffer behind the fence in back of Maintenance/Storage. (Use the saddleviewer/abc123 to enlarge it or download.) The problem that I have with the way the property looks in the inset picture and how it is platted is that more than a year ago Vice President PB told myself and another resident that from the southwest corner of the storage lot fence (where the Flyers Airport is) and south of the sand trap to the old dock pilings in the lake was the Property Boundary Line . VP PB should recall speaking to myself and one other SLR property owner and saying anything south of that line is ALICO Property . I will contact the person who was there with me that day and see if VP PB can clear up this matter for everyone as he was giving this information freely and confidently . I don't think anyone could forget something right under his nose that he was so sure of . And the time was when VP PB was going around and making notes and taking suggestions in his paper pad, I had mentioned some things about the paving which was being decided upon at the time if it helps to jog his memory. Call me Crazy
|
|
Anonymous Environmentalist
Guest
|
Post by Anonymous Environmentalist on Dec 22, 2013 17:20:33 GMT -5
The problem that I have with the way the property looks in the inset picture and how it is platted is that more than a year ago Vice President PB told myself and another resident that from the southwest corner of the storage lot fence (where the Flyers Airport is) and south of the sand trap to the old dock pilings in the lake was the Property Boundary Line . VP PB should recall speaking to myself and one other SLR property owner and saying anything south of that line is ALICO Property . I will contact the person who was there with me that day and see if VP PB can clear up this matter for everyone as he was giving this information freely and confidently . I don't think anyone could forget something right under his nose that he was so sure of . And the time was when VP PB was going around and making notes and taking suggestions in his paper pad, I had mentioned some things about the paving which was being decided upon at the time if it helps to jog his memory. Call me Crazy Well, guess what, when I was at the end of the driving range a few years back w/my dog and golf cart, I ran into JC, maintenance foreman, an he told me the exact same thing with regard to where the boundaries are; he never stated who was the adjacent property owner, but did give me the property boundaries exactly as they were given to the above poster.
|
|
|
Post by Call me Crazy on Dec 22, 2013 19:49:16 GMT -5
The problem that I have with the way the property looks in the inset picture and how it is platted is that more than a year ago Vice President PB told myself and another resident that from the southwest corner of the storage lot fence (where the Flyers Airport is) and south of the sand trap to the old dock pilings in the lake was the Property Boundary Line . VP PB should recall speaking to myself and one other SLR property owner and saying anything south of that line is ALICO Property . I will contact the person who was there with me that day and see if VP PB can clear up this matter for everyone as he was giving this information freely and confidently . I don't think anyone could forget something right under his nose that he was so sure of . And the time was when VP PB was going around and making notes and taking suggestions in his paper pad, I had mentioned some things about the paving which was being decided upon at the time if it helps to jog his memory. Call me Crazy Well, guess what, when I was at the end of the driving range a few years back w/my dog and golf cart, I ran into JC, maintenance foreman, an he told me the exact same thing with regard to where the boundaries are; he never stated who was the adjacent property owner, but did give me the property boundaries exactly as they were given to the above poster. Thank you for the reply A E ! That also would explain why the SLR Flyers sign was first installed (by SLR Maint.) at an angle and half way between the Fence corner and the old dock pilings also in line with what we were all told was the Property Boundary Line as I had stated previously . Soon, within days a few of the Flyers removed and repositioned the sign to its present location by the corner of the Storage Lot fence where we all see it now . I have the Phone number for ALICO and will do a follow up to get a copy of their Plat that is recorded . I am sure this will back up what we have been told by VP PB and Maint. foreman JC .
|
|
|
Post by Dick Tracy on Dec 22, 2013 22:02:11 GMT -5
This map is not a surveyors map, but I am curious about the area left of the black line that runs parallel with the fence. It is the area the driving range is located. Could that land possibly be own by Polk Co.? If that was the case, that land could be Dog Freedomville. I may make a trip to Bartow, to look at SLR's parcel drawings. Ja
|
|
|
Post by Psyco king on Feb 28, 2014 7:49:21 GMT -5
You may oppose the board but we will eventually drive you of different opinions out of the resort on a board if necessary
|
|
No Fear of Wind Bags
Guest
|
Post by No Fear of Wind Bags on Feb 28, 2014 8:03:30 GMT -5
You may oppose the board but we will eventually drive you of different opinions out of the resort on a board if necessary AWWWW ! look , someone is BUTT HURT ! Another cowardly person with a Battleship mouth and a Rowboat ASS !
No one fears a *nambe-pambe that makes idle threats , lets see you walk the walk moron !
Should we expect more carved up paint on vehicles and wood screws placed under the tires on Auto's belonging to women as your bunch of losers have done in the recent past ?
*Namby-pamby - Merriam-Webster Online
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/namby-pamby
adjective \ˌnam-bē-ˈpam-bē\. : too weak or gentle : not strong or strict enough. Full Definition of NAMBY-PAMBY. 1. : lacking in character or substance : insipid.
|
|
Anonymous Environmentalist
Guest
|
Post by Anonymous Environmentalist on Feb 28, 2014 10:03:05 GMT -5
You may oppose the board but we will eventually drive you of different opinions out of the resort on a board if necessary You said it all with your name--You are PSYCHO! You have no right(s) whatsoever to "drive" anyone out of this resort--just try it, the Polk County Sheriff's Department will be called, and you will go to jail, dbag.
You fail to realize that those other opinions that others have, and what gives them the RIGHT to voice those opinions is the FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, and NOBODY, NOT EVEN DBAG CAN TAKE THAT AWAY.
|
|
Anonymous Environmentalist
Guest
|
Post by Anonymous Environmentalist on Feb 28, 2014 10:15:39 GMT -5
You may oppose the board but we will eventually drive you of different opinions out of the resort on a board if necessary OOH, SOUNDS LIKE A THREAT FROM A BOARD MEMBER WHO WON'T ID HIMSELF!?!
Go ahead, carry out your idle threats, Polk County Sheriff's Dept. will show up at your door and you might get a ride to Bartow in cuffs.
Oh, and last, but not least, that THING that gives EVERYONE the RIGHT to voice their opinion(s) is called the FIRST AMENDMENT! and NO stinkin' board member is going to take that away from ANYONE in SLR!
|
|
|
Post by JG on Feb 28, 2014 10:44:31 GMT -5
You may oppose the board but we will eventually drive you of different opinions out of the resort on a board if necessary DB you'll either be in jail or dead before that happens . Like I said , bring your bluff game all you want . You all are too cowardly and gutless to stand in front of me and look me in the eyes . Shove it jerkoff .
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Feb 28, 2014 10:48:14 GMT -5
PSYCHO KING-you have just been banned. Guests to this forum expect and deserve a degree of civility and intelligence and you have shown that you possess neither. You and your kind are not welcome here. Peddle your cowardice and hate elsewhere.
S ue T eague
|
|
|
Post by JG on Feb 28, 2014 11:53:12 GMT -5
You may oppose the board but we will eventually drive you of different opinions out of the resort on a board if necessary This comment and the posting persons IP has been forwarded to PCSD on my existing Case number filed with PCSD .
Isn't the age of modern technology in SLR WONDERFUL !!!
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Feb 28, 2014 12:05:43 GMT -5
Excellent!
If this turns out to be DBag's IP, I will give you MY case number and join your complaint.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 2, 2014 10:04:08 GMT -5
The offensive post made by the Guest who was banned was NOT made by DBag's IP; it was made by a different IP i.e.63.156.26.214
DBag's IP is 63.156.26.225
I will do some sleuthing and see if I can identify any other posts made by Guest IP and perhaps an identify can be established.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 2, 2014 12:28:00 GMT -5
First attempt to ID the IP resulted in "signal coming from Kiosk Centers and a second address in Hatley, WI Area Code 715. I thought it was weird that Hatley is so close to "Hate".
I checked all the Wisconsin owners in S-bag (18) and have two potential matches. I will not publish their names because I can't prove anything and I really don't understand what the second address means anyway.
It also appears that the banned post was the ONLY post delivered to this Forum from that IP address.
Remember--the IP only identifies the computer and not the user.
|
|