Polk County Complaint-Issue #1 against SLohA
Aug 23, 2014 10:33:25 GMT -5
Dick Tracy, Im Trying, and 1 more like this
Post by Admin on Aug 23, 2014 10:33:25 GMT -5
Here is the County Record of the Complaint #1 against SLohA-Building without a permit. Next followup scheduled for 9/26/14.
Attachment Deleted
Attachment Deleted
Note that the County has ONLY talked with Mr Internet Bb and the Mamager--no one from our own BOD has been involved or possibly even knows about it except to approve $3200 in SLohA money to be expended for the Engineering report.
The remark that gobsmacked me in the face was that Internet Bb stated:
1- Mr. Bb disagrees with the County that he needs permits because he thinks the FCC allows his tower height on his property
2- He said he gave the other 4 towers to SLohA!
Just a few questions:
Does anyone recall the offer and acceptance by the membership of 4 tall communications towers to be planted on our common property and used solely by a private business owner to service thousands of Lake Wales customers at SLohA's risk?
Who paid for all the equipment and labor to install the equipment? When were these expenditures "moved and passed" at Board meetings?
Did the membership ever agree to spend assessment money for repair or replacement due to damage--and to pay the additional premises insurance and to also cover the deductible and non-covered costs to maintain the towers?
Did we agree to pay the lawsuits if one of the towers comes down in a hurricane and kills someone and destroys property? Are we insured for that possibility? Is anyone?
Did we agree to be answerable to thousands of non-owner private and corporate customers outside S-bag for their internet service in case a tower becomes non-operational?
Did we agree to let Sprint and Verizon and whoever to mount their dishes on our property without our knowledge or agreement? Did we agree to be compensated for leasing of the towers or for their customer outtages if there was a problem with the towers?
Is anyone being compensated for the big easy money of renting tower space to corporate concerns?
Did we agree to permit outside contractors uninterrupted travel in and out of our access gate to perform maintenance/installation work on these towers? Contractors who have gate passess and do not sign in---and who are not owners and do not live here. And who are not subject to any security clearance.
Did we agree to pay any municipal, state/federal taxes on behalf of the 2000+ customers receiving information services by a private corporation transmitting services from our equipment?
Was this ever discussed at a Board meeting? Are there any Minutes of this?
With the assistance of the attorney, I bet an Official Records request will be made to SLohA's BOD for all the information requested 3 years ago about these towers. The information was also requested about a year ago and for the second time, MANBOD claimed--for the second time-- that there was NO documentation.
Mr. Internet Bb stated publicly last December that contracts "were a waste of time". Well, that is ridiculous, but in this case, he may have outdone himself. If the towers belong to SLohA, by whatever method of backdoor dealings, hook 'n crook, then the good news is that SLohA can remove OUR equipment from OUR property.
Attachment Deleted
Attachment Deleted
Note that the County has ONLY talked with Mr Internet Bb and the Mamager--no one from our own BOD has been involved or possibly even knows about it except to approve $3200 in SLohA money to be expended for the Engineering report.
The remark that gobsmacked me in the face was that Internet Bb stated:
1- Mr. Bb disagrees with the County that he needs permits because he thinks the FCC allows his tower height on his property
2- He said he gave the other 4 towers to SLohA!
Just a few questions:
Does anyone recall the offer and acceptance by the membership of 4 tall communications towers to be planted on our common property and used solely by a private business owner to service thousands of Lake Wales customers at SLohA's risk?
Who paid for all the equipment and labor to install the equipment? When were these expenditures "moved and passed" at Board meetings?
Did the membership ever agree to spend assessment money for repair or replacement due to damage--and to pay the additional premises insurance and to also cover the deductible and non-covered costs to maintain the towers?
Did we agree to pay the lawsuits if one of the towers comes down in a hurricane and kills someone and destroys property? Are we insured for that possibility? Is anyone?
Did we agree to be answerable to thousands of non-owner private and corporate customers outside S-bag for their internet service in case a tower becomes non-operational?
Did we agree to let Sprint and Verizon and whoever to mount their dishes on our property without our knowledge or agreement? Did we agree to be compensated for leasing of the towers or for their customer outtages if there was a problem with the towers?
Is anyone being compensated for the big easy money of renting tower space to corporate concerns?
Did we agree to permit outside contractors uninterrupted travel in and out of our access gate to perform maintenance/installation work on these towers? Contractors who have gate passess and do not sign in---and who are not owners and do not live here. And who are not subject to any security clearance.
Did we agree to pay any municipal, state/federal taxes on behalf of the 2000+ customers receiving information services by a private corporation transmitting services from our equipment?
Was this ever discussed at a Board meeting? Are there any Minutes of this?
With the assistance of the attorney, I bet an Official Records request will be made to SLohA's BOD for all the information requested 3 years ago about these towers. The information was also requested about a year ago and for the second time, MANBOD claimed--for the second time-- that there was NO documentation.
Mr. Internet Bb stated publicly last December that contracts "were a waste of time". Well, that is ridiculous, but in this case, he may have outdone himself. If the towers belong to SLohA, by whatever method of backdoor dealings, hook 'n crook, then the good news is that SLohA can remove OUR equipment from OUR property.