|
Post by tinman on Mar 25, 2016 13:10:37 GMT -5
I ALSO WANT TO SEE AND READ THE CONTRACT BETWEEN SLohA AND KCNET! OH WAIT! IT DOESN'T EXIST!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 25, 2016 14:17:43 GMT -5
Finally.the Official Minutes
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 25, 2016 14:19:39 GMT -5
The Manager's Report as incorporated into the Official Minutes
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 25, 2016 14:52:01 GMT -5
From the Minutes:
I think that is a wonderful idea that is worthy of more discussion NOW--not two years from now at the next renewal. I would like to see the management vendor evaluated yearly by the membership and approved along with the budget for a raise/vote of confidence. Since the Florida law was passed almost a year ago, the statute describing electronic ballotting supercedes the Bylaws and can be implemented "anytime". (Board: Read 720.317 if/when SLohA is approved under FS720; you will see the FS720.317 supercedes FS617 and SLohA Bylaw and can save SLohA legal dollars by asking D Badd Nutcake for legal advice.) The board only needs to adopt a RESOLUTION--no bylaw change needed to implement this very specific new law.
This management company is already too embedded in SLohA affairs and they and their preferred vendors are "taking over" SLR with Stmbug Ixx's assistance. This often happens with aggressive management companies without meaningful oversight/performance goals coupled with timid/absentee boards. #budgetincreases
Additionally, I would like to see INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTING AUDIT FIRM changed every couple years, INDEPENDENT LEGAL SERVICES unconnected with Stmbug Ixx or any board member and an SLohA-employed Manager. There is way too much concentration of information and control under Toneesha's "guidance".
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 26, 2016 7:17:18 GMT -5
From the Minutes:
IMO, this represents further progression by the <board> (insert Stmbug Ixx Inc.) to marginalize and suppress owner concerns. Rather than allowing other members to learn about items of business that are serious enough to motivate an owner to write a letter, the board will use its own words/spin/bias to "summarize" the letter. I have already written that this practice has "gotten it completely wrong" right out of the gate and that means I have to write another letter to correct the misinformation published in the summary.
The board can easily publish the letters on its website. Will it do so?
Failure to do so will just result in more records requests and then we will inevitably see resistance from Toneesha who wants to charge for every piecemeal item of business that crosses her desk and blame the owners who are taking up so much time. She now even wants to charge for INSPECTION of records that are in digital format and require no more than a few minutes to pull up and provide to the inspector. (Toneesha: Owners already paid for digital re-recording to facilitate access--even though M. e. l./Management Company botched the project!) I think Toneesha wants a babysitting fee for Chap to sit with an owner while they are reading/copying. The law only provides for fees for making copies available but in this digital age, there is no need for paper handling and copying. There is also no records babysitting fee permitted.
In the final analysis, it is UP TO THE BOARD to determine what it will do to fairly represent the owners who elected them and to guide Toneesha to be cooperative with records requests. Unfortunately, it appears the board is taking its orders from Toneesha and purposely implementing policies to shut out owners from any information that might be transmitted through owner correspondence.
|
|
|
Post by Dick Tracy on Mar 27, 2016 0:43:00 GMT -5
My Opinion is that we need to return to having monthly Board Workshops, with Owner/Resident involvement. What better way to discuss issues and have Resident input, in a fair and balanced way. Workshops maybe a big step in the right direction.
What do others have to say about having Workshops again? Do you think it would be a positive move?
16RC
|
|
|
Post by BagLady on Apr 1, 2016 8:05:50 GMT -5
Dick Tracy wrote:
As far as I am concerned, the board has shown its true face. All Talk...no Walk. And even the talk was not that good. President made a half-hearted speech about experimenting with allowing owners to speak at meetings -under very tightly controlled parameters- in December, but since that time, conditions have deteriorated. Is there a possibility of redemption?
The board has demonstrated through what it does and does not do that it does not welcome owners poking around in the Management Company's or its affairs on many different fronts. They have shown an intent to engineer failure of "reopening communication" by staging confrontation (Debra Badd Nutjob's inflammatory statements and lies, unprofessional and argumentative behavior), encouraging disruptive behavior (tolerating audience boos and clapping, ordering "removal" of a member, tolerating assault), withholding/mistating facts about correspondence (failure to read correspondence, inaccurate summaries), lying about revitalization (lies about property management ie "no one to operate the wastewater plant"), failing to inform members that NO RULES were being revitalized, no second attorney opinion or disclosure of nature of concern to members, publishing lies about integrity of ballot/consent, and failing to resume workshops where meaningful input from owners can be heard by all.
And when cH allenged, they will say that it is the owners who are to blame and dialog cannot be tolerated in S-bag. GOTCHA!
Just when I thought the board could not get worse than the Reerookuh, Lws, Brnd, Jnsn and Suthrd gang--it does!
Would it be a positive move? Maybe...
|
|
|
Post by Dick Tracy on Apr 2, 2016 0:02:35 GMT -5
Summer is Coming Soon!
The Cats will Be Away, So The Mice Will Play.... We May Even Get Some "Good News About Revitalization".... Whether We Have Polk County Tower PERMITS or Not, The SHOW Will Continue..... 16RC
|
|