Post by Admin on Oct 3, 2016 5:32:01 GMT -5
Cross-post from Thread: "Sept 2016 BOD Meeting"
Two days ago, a young man came onto my property while I was outside working. Chitchat happened. A friend that was with me asked "Does the state of Florida require the individual meters be read?" Young man did not answer the question but replied "Well I know 'they' charge me for water usage!" I said "Water usage is a flat fee in SLR because it is a common expense. S-bag buys bulk water. There is no need to read meters for billing purposes". Young man seemed anxious to leave.
Here is the law regarding private operators, which SLohA is:
SLohA has no authority to bill any owner for an (undefined) "overuse" of water. It must budget the actual operating expenditures, which it refuses to disclose, despite an Official Records Request.
Two days ago, a young man came onto my property while I was outside working. Chitchat happened. A friend that was with me asked "Does the state of Florida require the individual meters be read?" Young man did not answer the question but replied "Well I know 'they' charge me for water usage!" I said "Water usage is a flat fee in SLR because it is a common expense. S-bag buys bulk water. There is no need to read meters for billing purposes". Young man seemed anxious to leave.
Here is the law regarding private operators, which SLohA is:
1999 Legislative Amendment to Ch. 367
Further recognition of water privatization contracting came with the 1999 amendments to Ch. 367, Water and Wastewater Systems. The definition of “governmental authority” was amended to include nonprofit corporations formed for the purpose of acting on behalf of a political subdivision with respect to a water or wastewater facility. This amendment clarifies that such transfers are required to be approved by the Public Service Commission as a matter of right pursuant to F.S. §367.071(4)(a).
Additionally, governmental authorities and water facilities operated by private firms under water facility privatization contracts are exempted from Public Service Commission regulation. As a result, both wastewater and water facilities operated under privatization contracts are now exempt from such regulation, although water privatization contracts are not defined or addressed elsewhere in the statutes.
Further recognition of water privatization contracting came with the 1999 amendments to Ch. 367, Water and Wastewater Systems. The definition of “governmental authority” was amended to include nonprofit corporations formed for the purpose of acting on behalf of a political subdivision with respect to a water or wastewater facility. This amendment clarifies that such transfers are required to be approved by the Public Service Commission as a matter of right pursuant to F.S. §367.071(4)(a).
Additionally, governmental authorities and water facilities operated by private firms under water facility privatization contracts are exempted from Public Service Commission regulation. As a result, both wastewater and water facilities operated under privatization contracts are now exempt from such regulation, although water privatization contracts are not defined or addressed elsewhere in the statutes.
SLohA has no authority to bill any owner for an (undefined) "overuse" of water. It must budget the actual operating expenditures, which it refuses to disclose, despite an Official Records Request.