|
Post by Admin on Dec 12, 2016 11:20:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 12, 2016 12:10:03 GMT -5
I wonder what a "Facilitated Workshop" is. Hopefully, not one facilitated by the Polk County Sheriff!
Suggestion to Board: It would help to "make inroads to communication" if the very expensive association website were used for advance signup to speak to items on the agenda where owners cannot attend the board meeting. It would also be helpful if there was a note or two about an agenda item so owners would have a clue about a topic to speak to, such as the one under "New Business-Facilitated Workshop". Why would anyone sign up to speak to something they had no clue about before the meeting?
Also, not everyone gets up at 9am or wants to go to a meeting. Many owners may be ill or have doctor appointments or mobility issues but might still want to participate in some manner in the governance of the community. Many might complain about Owner Apathy, but at least some of that apathy is attributable to lack of access and that is easily curable with some priority and effort to do so. Sure would be nice if the board meetings were posted online like the KoffeeKlatches and Sunday Church Services!
Sure would be nice to see some effort towards interactive communication and start the ball rolling for electronic voting. Why not start now by getting email addresses/permissions incorporated with the ballot materials? Florida has detailed instructions on setting this up for HOA's and has permitted it for 2 years. Make it an Election Committee post-election task. It's not rocket science and the database can be established efficiently with paper ballot materials! And you don't need legal advice to get email addresses and permissions! And it's FAR less expensive than paper production and mailing costs! It's another obvious way to chip away at unnecessary costs of administration of SLohA. S-bag management is still dragging its feet with paper ballot packages, poSt age stamps and a static post-it board website.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 14, 2016 13:44:08 GMT -5
Informal report from meeting attendee. Reportedly, the meeting was "all about" the budget and high legal costs. Schlz and Jnsn want to "redo" the budget and raise assessment 2-3%. The consensus buzz was very negative and there were many dissenting comments. People were talking about voting down the budget.
I will have to check the bylaws to see if they permit "redoing" the budget at this late date. It seems that there was a deadline to present proposed budget to owners. I'll take a look and check back later.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 14, 2016 13:56:39 GMT -5
The board CAN adopt an amended budget and propose it to Members. This must be done ON or BEFORE Dec 20th. The Board must furnish a copy of the proposed amended budget to each member. The board must ratify the amended budget at the Annual Meeting or a Special Meeting of the Members.
IMO, the current mood of the Members is such that a Special Meeting should be called to discuss a proposed Amended budget. The Budget Forum has already been held and the issue of high legal fees consumed a disproportionate part of the discussion. It is a contentious issue to raise the assessment fee BECAUSE of the high legal fees.
If the Board bypasses the Members prior to the Annual Meeting and adopts an increased budget, it runs the very real risk of the budget being voted down and having to repeat the process, (like what happened in 2014 with KCNet/Board internet fee invalid proposal). If the proposed budget is not ratified by membership, the CURRENT budget continues until a new one replaces it.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 14, 2016 14:07:21 GMT -5
I am now wondering if the Board was "counting on" getting reimbursed legal fees in a court order when it put the budget together. Or were they hoping the Clubs would give them money and bail 'em out?
Perhaps they want to get EVEN MORE owner money to spend on more legal fees with an appeal to the Circuit Court. This would cost thousands of thousands of dollars and would likely result in no recovery of fees. Even in the unlikely event a judgement was ordered.
To even propose a revised, increased fee at this late date is suggestive of a Board that is confused and a Management Company that is incompetent. I hope that the sponsors of this madness reconsider the broader implications of this reckless action.
|
|
|
Post by pestcontrol on Dec 14, 2016 14:12:49 GMT -5
Does anyone want to yell "UNCLE"? A 3% increase in fees = $15.00 per quarter.
In the past 3 years we have seen our fees go from $490.00 to now a potential $540.00 per quarter. All under the guidance of Stmbug Ixx, Inc. And our Board.
Let's see---$50.00 × 4 (quarterly ) = $200.00 × 787 units = $157,400. All under the guise of "legal fees". Something does not appear correct in these equations.
What will be the "crisis" next year? I vote to tighten our belts this year and do a very careful evaluation of all costs next year. Perhaps lower the management company 's fees.
We all know that once an increase is made, it will never be retracted.
|
|
|
Post by Lra on Dec 14, 2016 21:50:18 GMT -5
Today I attended my very last SLohA Board meeting due to my relocation. Nunsee Kabacinski ended the owner's comment session with a beautiful statement of the fine people living in S-bag. I so agree with her. I have experienced the love and friendship of many here in S-bag over the past 6 years. Life needs to be dominated by the love and compassion in our hearts. There is no other way. A closed or angry heart serves no one. And especially now, as we celebrate this timely season recognizing God's greatest gift of unconditional love, birth of his only begotten son, we need to start 2017 expressing our love for ALL. I wish everyone well and hold no malice against anyone and I sH all pray for the happiness and forgiveness that will heal all of our hearts. Lra 66 Silversides
|
|
gusto
Addict
"A Friend of Bill W."
Posts: 117
|
Post by gusto on Dec 14, 2016 22:41:21 GMT -5
I am now wondering if the Board was "counting on" getting reimbursed legal fees in a court order when it put the budget together. Or were they hoping the Clubs would give them money and bail 'em out? I would put my money on both.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 27, 2016 12:42:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 27, 2016 12:54:05 GMT -5
Dec 2016 Minutes Owner Comment:
Obviously, the board director who thinks the FL legislature will address the MRTA issue in the next legislative session is in LaLaLand. The Legislature's track record on bills affecting HOA's is quite bad. Note the MRTA bill did not even get to a Committee...
2016 LEGISLATIVE SESSION RESULTS:
HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATIONS (FS 720)
SB 792 -- Sen. Richter : Amending Documents, Rental Restrictions (Died in Committee) HB 653 -- Rep. J.Cortes : Creating Regulatory Agency (Died in Committee) HB 667 -- Rep. J. Cortes : 441 pages of changes (Died in Committee) SB 1122 -- Senator Alan Hays: Creating Regulatory Agency For HOAs (Died in Committee) SB 1292 -- Senator J. Ring : Provide financial reports to Division (Died in Committee) HB 1357 -- Rep. M. LaRosa : Little, mostly unimportant changes to FS 720 (Died in Committee) HB 1375 -- Rep. C.Stone : Companion Bill to SB 1122 (Died in Committee) HB 1405 -- Rep. R. Bracy : Provide financial reports to Division (Died on Calendar) SB 1526 -- Sen. D. Bullard : Developer Transition (Died in Committee) SB 1532 -- Sen. D. Soto : Extensive changes to HOA ACT (Died in Committee) SB 1716 -- Sen. T.Hutson : Little, mostly unimportant changes to FS 718 (Died in Committee)
MARKETABLE RECORD TITLE ACT
HB 7031 -- Rep. Passidomo : Exempts HOAs (Died on Calendar)
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION MANAGERS
SB 1512 -- Sen. D. Soto : Regulation of CAMs (Died in Committee)
HB 665 -- Rep. J. Cortes : Companion Bill for SB 1512 (Died in Committee)
|
|