|
Post by Admin on Jun 21, 2017 12:23:04 GMT -5
Just heard that Chap stated and wrote in the KK comments report that a board meeting was to be held for "maintenance items" and this was to be on June 21 (date of this post). I checked slresort.net for any notice or agenda. There was NO notice and NO agenda.
Chap's reminder at KoffeeKlatch does NOT meet statutory requirements of notice of a BOD meeting.
Would someone verify if this unnoticed meeting was actually conducted or if there was a mistake in the announcement at the KK? What in the world is going on with this BOD and Management Co?
|
|
|
Post by Dick Tracy on Jun 21, 2017 19:27:54 GMT -5
Now it could be a 4 Board Member Pow Wow... Or a Round Table Discussion, just call Chap and he may share more details.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 21, 2017 20:27:32 GMT -5
The belated Agenda. Still no notice in sight of the meeting.
We will be watching for the Minutes, the Manager's Report, the Correspondence Report and a belated Notice of Meeting. I imagine there were no Owner Comments since Owners had no notice that the meeting was being held.
I am told that the Agenda was posted on the bulletin boards in the park but since there are only a few people in the Bag and it is raining constantly, I wouldn't be surprised if no one saw the agenda either. I cannot see an Agenda or a REQUIRED 48-hour Notice of a Board meeting posted on the park property from California. I thought that was why SLohA was paying for a website.
Silly me.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 22, 2017 12:14:02 GMT -5
Dick Tracy posted:
Does not appear to be a quorum but I guess we will see when the Minutes come out with the Roll Call.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 22, 2017 18:50:48 GMT -5
CORRESPONDENCE REPORT
This is SECOND letter on this from Mr Dain that I can recall in the last 6 months. What happens to letters to the Board? File 13?
On a related note, I have heard of pests being sighted in the park and at least one resident has summoned pest control/eradication assistance.
The unsightly old phone and cable terminal boxes were the subject of an article in the NewsHound in 2011. This property does not belong to Owners and the equipment should be serviced or removed by the utility companies. It is now 6 years later... Is anyone awake and alert to these common grounds issues?
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 26, 2017 9:13:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 26, 2017 15:29:26 GMT -5
2017 June Minutes posted:
Oddly enough, rental problems in condo and Hoas have been a "hot topic" on the weblogs recently. This is a really pesky problem in condos near tourist areas that are seeing many AirBnB rentals. I would like to reassure anyone who is lamenting the absence of rules in S-bag and blaming rental problems on that deficiency that Rules are INSUFFICIENT to control rentals.
This reality is evidenced by complaints to DBPR from mostly condo owners. On arbitration, it is typically found that associations were wrong and overreached their authority by relying on rules/guidelines/bylaws/resolutions etc. RENTALS must be addressed in the superior document ie the Declaration aka CCR. If the CCR is silent as to rental and leasing restrictions, there is no rule that can be enacted that can regulate rental behavior. The rule must address a restriction already described in the contract aka Declaration.
In SLohA, there is only the "nuisance" provision and the # pet's restriction in the CCR that can be cited in a request for compliance. HOA must only talk to the Owner unless there is an immediate emergency.
Notwithstanding that the covenant revitalization is currently being appealed, SLohA Declaration was written for a campground; therefore, there were no restrictions addressing "rentals". SLohA has no authority over rentals regardless of whether or not the revitalization "stands". It can only request the Owners have their Tenants behave and hope that the Owner takes care of the problem.
It also makes no difference if the Tenant is under 55 or 105. That Amendment, regardless of whether it is eventually permitted to be revitalized, has nothing to do with rentals and leasing. It has to do ONLY with occupancy and the requirements of Florida's Housing Act.
I am mystified as to where #4 comment is coming from ie "discontinuing the Manager's Report at KK". Is this under consideration? (Stmbug Ixx did this in 2010 when it was discovered that his property manager was not a licensed CAM. Manager reports were abruptly stopped until she could get licensed.) I hope this is not being seriously considered as it is one of the very few pipelines of timely information about the property remaining to owners.
No back up alarms on equipment vehicles? Just another in the growing list of SLohA premises liability risk factors. Probably the umbrella policy will take care of settling any injury or death lawsuits.
|
|
|
Post by Dick Tracy on Jun 26, 2017 17:31:03 GMT -5
$14,000 for SLohA's perimeter fence repair? I was under the impression the perimeter fence had been repaired in the last several months. Maybe I am mistaken, or we have had damaged fencing from fallen trees, or maintaining the fence line perimeter in general with our power grass cutting equipment.
$14,000 plus is not pocket change!
|
|