|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 15, 2013 12:07:42 GMT -5
Cross-post from AnonNews Attachment DeletedAttachment DeletedAttachment DeletedMarch 1, 2013 We are seeing common property suddenly littered with signs, paid for out of your assessments, as if a sign were a valid rule. Management is trying to force compliance to its wishes through intimidation. _________________________________________________________ March 2, 2013 Just found out that the new signs are IN CONCRETE on our common property on metal upright poles. _____________________________________________________ March 5, 2013 About the new signs mounted in cement and on steel pipe : Were 4X4 posts out of season on this hasty project ? I would think steel pipe would cost several times as much as pressure treated lumber that can be picked up at Lowes or Home Depot. Could this purchase of steel pipe also be considered a "spendthrift"(extravagant and extremely wasteful) action ? It appears that SLR has plenty of money to be wasted foolishly by a Sm all minority that answers to no one. __________________________________________________ May 2, 2013 Please Help. Where do I walk my Cat. The sign says DOGS with an arrow pointing to the left. My Cat has rights also. __________________________________________ May 5, 2013 If you only have only one dog do the signs even matter ? It says DOGS plural. _______________________________________________________- |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 15, 2013 12:34:19 GMT -5
Cross-post from AnonNews
March 20, 2013
With all the money spent on the NO DOGS ALLOWED signs and steel posts they are mounted on one would think that the powers that be would have considered purchasing and installing several doggie doodoo grab-a-bag stations in Dog Friendly areas.
The over the top signage really seems like there is more to the story than some unknown golfer stepping in what has been called imaginary dog droppings.
Does anyone know why this big push to corral dogs with such aggressivness by management ? It appears that the dogs are the biggest concern and the actions of the Board of Directors have been very nasty to some Owners/Residents .
________________________________________________________________
I think MisManagement has selected "dogs" are her rallying issue possibly because it is one problem that most of her infants seem to complain about consistently; hence her sage advice during KK for affected individuals to "call the Sheriff" to complain about poop since she is powerless to control the owners' dog product.
A surprising benefit to IT is that she has targeted certain individuals for persecution and they happen to be dog owners.
This issue fits conveniently into IT's next pathologic act of domination and control--to start fining owners for all manner of infractions.
Dog poop nicely coincides with Management's inept and embarrassing handling of the dog mauling cases on the property and the costs of settling lawsuits beneficial to favored employee-owners.
Like our website proclaims about traffic in here "We are serious about doogie doo doo and we ENFORCE it!", this has become a public declaration of overcompensation for the supposed benefit of the "public relations eye in the sky" aka insurance underwriters. Owners will pay this cost in perpetuity in the form of higher insurance premiums for liability, director/officer indeminfication coverage and possible further coverage exclusions, not to mention the fact that this HOA has become a frequent flyer in the lawsuit world since elected (possibly) Directors abandoned common sense and fiduciary duty when the "Management Company" took over.
_______________________________________________
March 21, 2013
I noticed the sewage odor when my dog and I went all rogue and mavericky and rode the golf cart down to the driving range and flying field recently. We went to admire all the nice new signs pockmarking the property but our delicate sensibilities were assaulted by the most vile sewage odor EVAH! She whined, I dry heaved and we got outta dere!
_______________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 15, 2013 12:54:09 GMT -5
May 28, 2013
Management says do not Feed The Squirrels, we have had 3 Squirrel Bites in The Park. I am placing my own sign: "Squirrels" Free Nuts in Back-Yard. ( No,No, The BOD is not in my back-yard!!)
________________________________________________
We need NO ANGRY SQUIRRELS ALLOWED signs now .
That should fix it !
________________________________
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 15, 2013 23:39:55 GMT -5
Cross-post from AnonNews
September 14, 2013
Is Alico Inc aware that SLohA is littering their property with IT signs?
_______________________________________________________
September 15, 2013
I believe that NO DOGS ALLOWED sign was moved to the storage yard's fence's far corner. If I remember right, the need to move the DOG SIGN back next to the fence corner, was because it was originally placed on the airplane landing area. That was the excuse, but I think they knew it was not on SLR's common property. I maybe wrong, my memory is only good for 24hrs. Do I have this right?
________________________________________________--
The sign was moved ,yes. It was on the property line first and in conflict with arrivals and departures which only occur for about 4 to 5 months in the winter season.
The property line is approx. from the corner fence post to the lake where there is a pole with survey tape atop of it.
As told to myself and one other fellow 2 years ago by VP of BOD P. Bxxxxx.
P.S. I have checked with FAA & Alico Inc. and both said they are unaware of an Airport in the given location .
____________________________________________________
So I guess I got it right. Note: The Airplanes will be landing on SLR's Lake. Then the airplane will proceed to taxi to our New Dock.
_____________________________________________
Are we talking about TOY AIRPLANES here ?
____________________________________________-
Beware of All crafts in SLR--aircraft (carports), handicraft (dog signs), hovercraft (floating boat dock), pleasurecraft (beer boats), spacecraft (spycams), witchcraft (anything from 499) etc...
___________________________________________________
Hey Craft, Stop posting........Your drunk!
_____________________________________________
PosterRoaster/Anon above: how the heck can you <hiccup> know that?
_________________________________________________
Witchcraft? Is that the collection of flying broomware at 499?
___________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
Post by wee willy on Oct 22, 2013 19:07:36 GMT -5
Signs,Signs
Everywheres theres signs
Do this ,Don't do that
Cant you read the signs
An old song
|
|
|
|
Post by Anon Guest Person on Nov 24, 2013 8:35:50 GMT -5
Get ready for more restrictive NO DOGS ALLOWED SIGNS . The Vacationing Canadians @ #11 GQ have complained to manbod that they do not want ANY dogs behind the Maint. Area adjacent to the Snake Sanctuary , no dogs around the trail bordering Alico property and the Airport/Golfing Area .
According to an informed source manbod had caved to 1 complaint from people that don't even live in this Country and will purchase and install more restrictive signs where the NO DUMPING ALLOWED signs are .
More to come on this as many of us year round residents will not have our freedoms and rights sanctioned by anyone without a fight and especially from NON Americans that only visit our United States .
|
|
|
|
Post by BagLady on Nov 24, 2013 10:12:20 GMT -5
What a bonehead thing to suggest! (Doesn't matter where they are vacationing from--it's bonehead from anyone!) When push comes to shove, the only pet restrictions that can be validated are on the original Declarations in the 1970's. Even if one wants to accept the last Pet Rule written by  ? as valid, there is nothing in the restriction to prevent pets, properly leashed and cleaned up after, from accompanying their owners in these areas. MANBOD's rule-making authority does not extend to making rules that are more restrictive than the Covenants--they can only clarify or qualify existing restrictions. This is documented in SOP's, which owners are not allowed to read and typically apply to usage and operating hours for buildings, facilities and amenities. Only owners can, on a ballot measure affirmed by 50%+ vote, make a new rule that cannot conflict with the Covenants. (In my non-legal opinion, this is why the carport "rule" will not survive legal scrutiny.) Anyone suggesting that "leadership" attempt to restrict the use of common property in this way is "uninformed" and could be unknowingly inviting a pissed off dog owner to bring "breach of covenants and fiduciary duty" lawsuits against SLohA. MANBOD should let sleeping dogs lie with regard to pursuing any pet rules--especially in light of the feral cat colony being maintained by the mange on our common property, a still-unresolved nuisance and disgrace. Pet rules are as easily cH allengable as the "carport" restriction and frankly, the mood in here is heating up with regard to this regime's handling of just about everything. |
|
|
|
Post by Scooby Doo on Jan 21, 2016 8:26:50 GMT -5
Cross-post from AnonNews March 1, 2013 We are seeing common property suddenly littered with signs, paid for out of your assessments, as if a sign were a valid rule. Management is trying to force compliance to its wishes through intimidation. _________________________________________________________ March 2, 2013 Just found out that the new signs are IN CONCRETE on our common property on metal upright poles. _____________________________________________________ March 5, 2013 About the new signs mounted in cement and on steel pipe : Were 4X4 posts out of season on this hasty project ? I would think steel pipe would cost several times as much as pressure treated lumber that can be picked up at Lowes or Home Depot. Could this purchase of steel pipe also be considered a "spendthrift"(extravagant and extremely wasteful) action ? It appears that SLR has plenty of money to be wasted foolishly by a Sm all minority that answers to no one. __________________________________________________ May 2, 2013 Please Help. Where do I walk my Cat. The sign says DOGS with an arrow pointing to the left. My Cat has rights also. __________________________________________ May 5, 2013 If you only have only one dog do the signs even matter ? It says DOGS plural. _______________________________________________________- I was wondering why these signs are still in place? I hear they were from the former manager and that there is no enforcement to back up these huge glaring restrictive signs. I also understand that the entire area is a recreational area and our expired covenants have nothing in them about restricting land use. In fact, Polk County has allowed land use to be modified in SLR as recent as last summer. Instead of these ridiculous over sized signs there should be some doggie doo doo stations with bags to pick up waste and a fence by the road. Twice now i have had to slam on the brakes when little dogs (off leash) have ran on to the road to chase my golf cart. Every resort i have been to has paid attention to these little details to make a safe place for dog people to enjoy the dog park, except this place. I also don't understand why the area doesn't have proper drainage and traps water after it rains, I have been told that it was also the last manager that caused this problem with dog run drainage by re-grading the area and didn't care that it made the area unusable due to trapped rain water. I would like to see the signs come down or be changed to something a little less hostile and more park friendly and maybe some stations on each end for waste pick up and disposal and a residential fence to make a safety zone for dogs being dogs. Does there need to be a dog committee to get this started or will management decide to take this on? |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 21, 2016 9:14:59 GMT -5
Scooby Doo posted:
Another useless committee? Please...
After trying to find the Board Meeting Minutes on the new website; only to find the Minutes were actually the AGENDA, I think that another new committee would be pointless. With this board, anything that the Owners bring up as "new business" gets forgotten and becomes "dead non-business". Why immortalize the BOD's non-action by giving it a committee name?
I finally found the abbreviated, unapproved "Minutes" under the Owner Update on the new website--and learned that this BOD has not, as of the Jan 2016 Meeting:
1- Published the approved Minutes from the Privileged Nov 25th 2015 Meeting
2-Has had NO followup to the ADA information that Chap said "needed more research" at the Nov and Dec 2015 meetings--per Owner request
3- No progress on establishing an ADA Committee that Clf assured us would "be looked into in a timely manner" at the Nov and Dec 2015 meetings--per Owner request
4- No progress on recommendation or setting up a monthly assessment payment option promised in November 2015 by Toneesha--per Owner request
5-No progress on the liability related to Clubhouse rental practice by non-owners that was such a burning issue in Nov 2015 per Owner correspondence,
6-Despite 3 records request followups by Owners, Owners still do not have a focused response on the issue of liability coverage for stab's unpermitted towers trespassing on our common properties
7-No update on the supposed Sale/Lease Agreement whereby SLohA proposes to enter into an unauthorized enterprise agreement with stab since October 2015--per Owners stab/Brnd special interests
8-No update on the status of the 4 Polk County Code citations against SLohA related to the UNPERMITTED internet towers on SLohA common property since these were issued Aug 2014 and remain outstanding-per Owners stab/Brnd special interests
9-Despite 2 Owner requests/followup, NO "2nd attorney opinion on revitalization" which the board authorized at the Dec 16, 2015 meeting and still has not been produced or commented on progress--or explained...
10-No Minutes of the Mid-Dec 2015 Organizing Committee Meeting which likely was attended by a 5-director quorum (4 of which are ON the Committee) who agreed to make a motion for a 2nd attorney opinion for unknown/unstated reasons
11- NO INFORMATION on revitalization since announcing on Jan 6, 2016--including NO explanation to Owners about the Omission of Revitalized Rules/Regs.
12- No "financials" posted on the new website, as referenced by Treasurer, except the June 2015 report. Presumably, the December 2015 "financials" are available for the Jan 2016 BOD meeting, though that was not specifically referenced in Treasurer's detailed report. These reports are supposed to be posted by Stmbug Ixx/Toneesha by pushing a button linking the "integrated" websites.
|
|
? as valid, there is nothing in the restriction to prevent pets, properly leashed and cleaned up after, from accompanying their owners in these areas.