gusto
Addict
"A Friend of Bill W."
Posts: 117
|
Post by gusto on Apr 4, 2014 13:49:07 GMT -5
I have been researching designs for RV-Ports, they are very popular in a few RV Resorts in Florida. Of course any RV Port would have to be approved by Polk County. I do not see any restrictions on RV Ports in our new Rule Book. But I may have over looked something on RV-Ports, not being allowed. Just an idea at this point in time.  |
|
|
|
Post by Dick Tracy on Apr 4, 2014 14:01:30 GMT -5
Normally you would have RV Ports in upscale RV Resorts. I doubt if SLR's Management would give out a permission slip for any type of RV Port in our community.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 4, 2014 20:42:12 GMT -5
Permission slips are an attempt to control owners' reactions and behavior; MANBOD is training owners to seek permission before acting and maintaining dependent and submissive states. In a mature, adult world that I would like to live in, permission slips should be "advisory" or provide "notice of intent" to let know that building will occur within the park. The only permission required should be Polk County Building Code. (This is what the PETITION seeks.) Attachment Deleted Attachment DeletedRV Portes are not specifically prohibited because: ... SLohA is an RV park and RV portes are usually ancillary structures to CBS homes, manufactured homes and park models. In some cases, they are provided for in RV parks-but not in SLR ... since the covenants restrict parcel use to transient RV's and personal property on the site is strictly limited, one cannot expect to erect an RV porte as a permanent ancillary structure to either a permitted RV or to a non-wheeled structure. However-if your parcel has expired covenants--and the county will issue a permit for an RV porte--and you are prepared to fuss with an angry MANBOD having a hissy or a disgruntled homeowner still encumbered by covenants- Go for IT! Anytime one asks a question about land use restrictions in SLR, it should be framed within the context of a transient RV park. "What would a Developer of a transient RV park "reasonably" put into the covenants?" Would they want to restrict occupancy to only people over 55 year of age? Of course not- no age restrictions were placed on SLR property by the Developer.
Would they anticipate foreclosing on popup campers if owners failed to pay their assessments? No, Developer provided only for a lien to be placed on personal property. Our covenants are irrelevant to "today" because they do not apply to "real world" parcel use as extended, non-mobile shelter. Additionally, the Covenants are fixed and the Association has no authority to change them. The covenants were concepted for mobile, wheeled shelter that would not remain in place--unoccupied-- for more than a few days. |
|
