REPOST selected replys related to the original thread to help Guests follow the sequence of events. This thread "strayed" onto another thread.May 23, 2014 at 7:56am Admin said:
Possibly, this irrational and overbearing show of force will give the Judge a "metamessage". One lone elderly female resident bringing a complaint against 4 old white men shielding a female that serves them. That physical setup alone suggests that there is some lack of balance in this scenario and more probing is needed. Good. The more questions that are asked, the more it will become apparent that this owner is opposed by a disgruntled gathering of the "governing powers" and a reason emerges to form the basis of the complaint.
___________________________________________________
Post by Lra on May 23, 2014 at 2:01pm
The attempt to put a Restraining order on MK was thrown out by the judge. When Lra applied for the order, she was told that she needed to prove harassment etc. She did her research well and was able to show a good proof; however this judge said, "if she did not harm you PHYSICALLY directly", then he would dismiss the case. So, according to this judge Ml would have had to come up and hurt Lra. Instead she hurts and harasses emotionally through her staff. I, Gngr, thought I would write the truth before it all gets twisted up. Now, for all you who want to invent stuff, have your field day and eventually the truth will come out.
Poor JC, Ml got all over her today over an "un"rule and Jane does not have the money to make it "Ml's way". Ml is an insensitive , b...., Jane hasn't even begun to be over her mourning for GC.
Ml, I'm sure you read this, where did you get your penchant for such cruelty. All the while smiling and saying,"Hon" to people old enough to be your parent. Is this some sickening south thing, I thought you were from Michigan.
To end my little diatribe, I want to say Ml did not win today, we were just in the wrong court. Who knows what is ahead?
_________________________________________________________________________
SLANTY
Post by Guest on yesterday at 4:47am
What's up, Doc? Ml the tormentor was finally tormented? GOOD.
_________________________
Post by Lra on May 23, 2014 at 3:45pm
Success is measured in different ways by different people. I found today to be very successful as I know that Ml just lived through 10 days of h...
______________________________________________________-
Post by observer on May 23, 2014 at 2:32pm
This is what it's all about, Rule 4-4G.1 and I quote from the "new" rule book: "Porches are permitted and may be enclosed only if it is included in the overall measurement of twenty-four (24) feet by forty-eight (48) feet as set forth in Regulation 4-4B.1."
Now, I ask you, what if the porch is NOT enclosed as is 66 Silverside?
When I asked Ml, she said,"You know what we mean." I said, "I do not know what you mean or imply or whatever." How are we to read this as SHE wants it read?
By the way, she did not refer us to the "definitions" and we did not go there. We just stuck with what she showed us. And that's the truth, so help me God.
_________________________________________________________
May 23, 2014 at 11:22am @jm said:
Why would our Leaders want to terminate any employee that is doing their Dirty Work for them. The employees are the Dummies, and they do not realize it. Some day soon I hope this all changes, from The TOP Down...
__________________________________________________
Post by Guest on May 23, 2014 at 11:28am
Am I missing something? Who initiated the injunction process? Was I Ml or a resident at 66 Silversides? Who were the 4 board members who went to the hearing? From what I hear is that none of the board members were there and those who were subpenaed had to be there. And how did the injunction turn out? What did the Judge have to say about the injunction? What was the ruling?
If we are to believe those creating these situations, how can we if the legal system they are misusing won't even support their frivolous accusations which their actions are creating in the first place?
The covenants have been accepted as legitimate by the court and legal system each time the boards have brought them before them. The covenants are there to protect slr so it doesn't become like Camp inn and others which are not nearly as nice and as well kept as slr is.
Yes, there are things I don't like, but when I bought in I knew that there are things i can and cannot do because of the covenant in place.
Why is so much energy spent fighting and lawsuits? I'm a boomer, I rebel from time to time over the rules of society ... yet, I am aware enough to realize that most are there for protection and order. It's part of what we all signed up for when we bought in ... come on ... grow up!
_________________________________________________________
If this bunch of over the hill Q-Tips lose in this hearing no doubt they will want to form their own court, judge-jury and executioners all.
President/Judge PeaBrain residing!
________________________________________________________________