|
Post by Admin on Jun 7, 2014 12:37:50 GMT -5
Here is the image of the SECOND Police Informational Report filed on 5/29/14. The nature of the report is "Information/Non-Crime and the Activity reported was "Criminal Mischief-Felony". Attachment Deleted Attachment Deleted Attachment DeletedThe report was filed additionally to the initial report for general harassment, threats and damage to personal property. Reportedly, the reason the second report was filed was because Owner suddenly experienced "irregularity" in the drivability of her golf cart under normal operation. Upon examination of the tires-thinking one was low or flat-owner discovered that 4 lug nuts had been loosened--ALL with consistent revolutions for the loosened nuts. Alarmed owner further examined golf cart and discovered that charger wires appeared to have been cut. (Charger was stored on the golf cart). Owner then called Sheriff to file a report of suspected tampering with her equipment by hostile agents within SLR. Additionally, SLohA's Maintenance Foreman, JK, was interviewed with regard to Owner's property damage at her shed. JK admitted to the Officer that he had cut the shed Elctc cord wire specifically under orders from the Mange and did so to avoid accusations of insubordination and protect his continued employment. This report took 2 hours of Officer investigative time. Editable text will be added when the conversion is complete, but Guests can use the saddleviewer sign-in to access the image files in the meantime.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 7, 2014 14:17:07 GMT -5
Here is the TEXT of the Police Narrative (spaces inserted in names by poster):
On May 29, 2014, I was dispatched to 66 Silversides St. Lake Wales in reference to a possible criminal mischief. Upon arrival contact was made with the Reportee Lra Tom ay ko who advised me that someone messed with her golf cart. Lra advised that she believes someone loosened the lug nuts on one of her wheels and someone also cut the wires on her golf cart battery charger.
Lra believed this all occurred sometime between 5-24-14 (date corrected by poster) at 0700 hours and 5-24-14 at 1800 hours at her other residence of 7 Royal Coachman St. Lra discovered the damage to the charger when she went to plug it into the wall. She advised it began to spark intensely but she did not receive any Injuries as a result. By the time Lra reported this incident the lug nuts had already been re tightened but she did have the battery charger with her in the golf cart. After close examination of the battery charger it was determined that the wires looked as though they were somehow pulled out and not cut.
While on scene Lra advised me of an ongoing issue she is having with the S-bag Park manager, M elanie Kr em kow, and one of the security guards, Ter ry Hav en. She advised that approximately 1 month ago she learned that Me lanie ordered a maintenance worker, J ohn Krummey, to cut an extension cord she was using to run fans in a shed inside of S-bag. Lra advised the shed had a lot of her personal items inside, storing them while she was moving. Lra advised when she first started using the power at the shed, which is provided by S-bag and paid for by them, there was no sign stating that the power was for temporary use only.
A short time later a sign was posted stating the power was for temporary use only but did not specify how long temporary was, according to Lra. After that sign was posted Lra advised her extension cord was cut by an unknown subject at that time. She later found out that J ohn was ordered to cut the cord by M elanie for an unknown reason. I later interviewed J ohn in reference to this incident (see interview). Lra advised she did not report that incident because she was not worried about it but believes Me lanie has it out for her.
Lra has also had problems with the security guard T who has been saying things to people around the park, never to her personally, and setting fire to her house because they don't want her living there, Lra currently had a civil lawsuit with S-bag for the actions of Me lanie and T.
Lra was provided with the case number regarding this incident and was advised to notify law enforcement of any further incidents.
I interviewed S-bag maintenance worker J ohn Krummey, and was told:
J ohn advised that approximately one month ago he was ordered by Me lanie, his boss, to go and cut an extension cord because it had been plugged in too long. The cord he cut, unknown to him at the time, belonged to Lra. J ohn advised that he could have just unplugged the cord, but was advised by Me lanie to specifically cut the cord. J ohn advised he did not know why she wanted this done but did it because he was afraid of losing his job for insubordination if he didn't. He also advised that when he cut the cord, there was a sign up that only stated that the power was for temporary use only which he believes is too vague and should specify a certain time. J ohn had no further involvement in any other incidents other than his regular maintenance duties.
I had no further involvement in this Case.
Investigative Costs: One (1) Deputy Sheriff for two (2) hours.
|
|
gusto
Addict
"A Friend of Bill W."
Posts: 117
|
Post by gusto on Jun 8, 2014 0:48:50 GMT -5
This Report of MK telling a Supervisor, to do harm to ones personal property, needs to go into her personnel file. Someone needs to send this report to B ud Stmb Ixx via USPS-Certified-Return Receipt Mail. Follow up,with a e-mail to Stmb Ixx Inc. H.R.Dept. This behavior is unacceptable, to say the lest. Florida C.A.M. Licensing Dept may like to have a copy also. A Case of Abuse of Power....
|
|
|
Post by BagLady on Jun 8, 2014 10:08:37 GMT -5
100% agree. This situation is out of hand and it is now documented straight from the horse's mouth to a law officer. Management Company's employee has spun way out of control with her manipulation and intimidation of people under her control--a now-dangerous condition which BOD has abdicated the responsibility for.
Management Company should get a certified copy of a mailing of this report---along with the BOD--and should be advised that 's behavior is unacceptable to the people living here and SHE SHOULD BE REMOVED. Also, complaints can be filed on BOTH the CAM license and Stmbug Ixx's FIRM license for continued sponsoring of this individual on the property. There is plenty of anecdotal history on the Mange to establish a pattern of hateful, threatening and punitive behavior. I think we can pretty much discount the BOD except for written notice; they have NO control of this and are a pitiful joke of functioning representatives of SLohA members. They need to be removed from office ASAP in SLohA's faux elections.
There are now SEVEN Owners (that I know about) in the park who have been maliciously victimized by this regime. SIX have filed Police Reports and one civil lawsuit which was settled in favor of Owner and there is a second pending lawsuit. This is not counting the victims we know about who are not owners (Lorenzo Parker filed and settled a lawsuit in his favor), Owners who are too scared to speak up (I know one of them) and employees of SLohA who are only trying to do their jobs and being used as Mange puppets to carry out her revengeful orders. THEY are also victims, but this situation would not exist if two conditions did not exist: 1- hiring from within SLR and 2-BOD abdicating control to IT.
Owners should step up their critical observation of MANBOD's behavior in general and MANGE's in particular and always complain immediately to the Sheriff when unexplained damage to property occurs or if they feel personal threat from any employee of SLohA.
|
|
|
Post by Zippity-Do-Da on Jun 8, 2014 11:09:43 GMT -5
There will be some new information coming out about T Hayvn in the very near future.
|
|
|
Post by Lra on Jun 8, 2014 11:20:53 GMT -5
The date should read 5/24/14 7 pm as the first date not 5/ 2/14.
|
|
|
Post by Anonymous on Jun 8, 2014 11:31:05 GMT -5
Would the validity of this report be affected or cH allenged because the maintenance foreman's last name is misspelled? The maintenance foreman's last name is actually spelled: C-r-u-m-m-e-y.
|
|
|
Post by BagLady on Jun 8, 2014 14:25:10 GMT -5
@lra-are you referring to the date of discovery as 5/24? I can append the post; let me know if any more corrections are needed. The OCR converter does make mistakes and I don't always catch them.
5/24 was a Saturday.
|
|
|
Post by BagLady on Jun 8, 2014 14:28:40 GMT -5
This would not be reasonably cH allengable as there is no basis for confusing him with someone else. JC is identified as a maintenance employee and identifies MANGE as his boss. Also, he is identified on the cover sheet with age, DOB and other characteristics.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 8, 2014 14:42:50 GMT -5
Oh boy Zippy. I can hardly wait from more disturbing news about that guy!
|
|
|
Post by courious on Jun 14, 2014 13:24:51 GMT -5
Mels Cam license number issued 09-13-2012 batch no. 128078878 Cam38543 expires September 30,2014. Issued through the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. AC#6364993.
Complaints can be filed either through email or by letter. The more documentation per incident of harassment, intimidation, selective rule enforcement, mismanagement, etc. filed before renewal the better.
|
|
Anonymous Environmentalist
Guest
|
Post by Anonymous Environmentalist on Jun 14, 2014 19:10:21 GMT -5
Mels Cam license number issued 09-13-2012 batch no. 128078878 Cam38543 expires September 30,2014. Issued through the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. AC#6364993. Complaints can be filed either through email or by letter. The more documentation per incident of harassment, intimidation, selective rule enforcement, mismanagement, etc. filed before renewal the better.
Can Curious give us more info:
What type of agency is this? State, Federal?
Do you have a website address or how do you get ahold of these folks? maybe paste the link right here, so it's easier for people to complain about this waste product of a manager that definitely needs to GO!
What is this AC # you referenced? Is it important to reference it when making a complaint or just our manager's name and license #? Thanks for any additional info you can provide; believe you me, it is needed and appreciated!
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 15, 2014 12:32:37 GMT -5
CAM's are "regulated"--if you want to call it that--by STATE Dept of Professional Business Profession. In the past, the DPBR has been a licensing, education and license renewal entity and has administered suspensions and revokation of licenses. It is generally recognized that this agency has been woefully inadequate providing disclosure and oversight for compliance with CAM activities which generate complaints and/or discipline. For instance, DPBR removed the licensing reporting page from its website where the public could "look up" any complaints on individual CAMs and posted this on its website. Now, the public cannot conveniently "look up" a CAM but must jump through hoops and an extended wait period to acquire information that was previously immediately available: As of Nov 2013, CAM's are additionally regulated by DPBR: ...in addition to the new requirement for registration, the HOA governance was changed to provide the DBPR with the authority to, “…take administrative action against a community association manager’s license for violations of state laws relating to condominiums, cooperatives and homeowners’ associations that are committed during the course of performing contractual community management services.” The website has a "complaint package" that must be filled out completely by anyone who wishes to file a complaint against a CAM. Given the DPBR track record of reluctance to pursue licensee complaints, it is particularly important to be extremely detailed in providing documentation for a complaint. A verbal, undocumented complaint is not sufficient to get the DPBR's attention. Here is the package: Attachment DeletedThis is the DPBR website for CAMs--all you can do it identify a licensee and the current status of the license: DPBR CAM Licensing
|
|
|
Post by slanty on Jun 20, 2014 4:28:10 GMT -5
I assume illegal acts such as ordering an underling to destroy personal property of a resident would suffice as a legitimate complaint on M. e. l.'s license. I wonder if the parties involved will be notifying the State? I know I would.
|
|
|
Post by Carol Grnt on Jun 20, 2014 7:08:00 GMT -5
I assume illegal acts such as ordering an underling to destroy personal property of a resident would suffice as a legitimate complaint on Ml's license. I wonder if the parties involved will be notifying the State? I know I would. As well would be instructing a security person, B obby E lkins to run me off the road back in July, 2011--as B.E. stated to my husband: "...that is what I was instructed to do..." If the manager is B.E.'s "boss" then that's the one who instructed him...
|
|