|
|
Post by Alaska HEMI R/T Jm Admin. on Aug 16, 2014 8:43:55 GMT -5
To Secondhandmillionaire: It was already reported on this forum the info on why the gate is not functioning properly. I can't recall where it was posted but it was reported several days ago that the gate was struck by lightening and had to be removed to be fixed at a shop somewhere else, (and you're right, this isn't the place for a post about the front gate.)
You can ALWAYS keep up about what's going in SLR if you just read the recent posts section which can easily be accessed by going to the BOTTOM of the HOME page, find where it says "recent posts" in BLUE--then click on that and all recent posts will be there for you to peruse. (anything in BLUE can be clicked on as a link to it--this includes all the threads that have been created by those who post here.)
I would like to add that you wont find any pertinent or complete factual information on ANY of the SLohA managed internet sites. The administrators of those sites do not want anyone to have all the information on any particular topic. Keeping residents uniformed is an obvious ploy to pull the wool over as many peoples eyes as possible. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Aug 16, 2014 10:14:05 GMT -5
Au contraire! Kay c Networks a current sponsor for S-bag & CHUG. There are at least two redirect links from KCN to S-bag's Official Websites. There, (on KCNetwork) Mr. Steyeb has fully and completely given information about the "terrestrial internet service" he offers and territories covered/costs etc. There is certainly no information blackout or propaganda on SLohA's...er..Kay c's/SLohA's websites where this commercial interest is concerned.
For some time, the lines have been blurring between K C Ntwerk and S-bag/MANBOD. Owners have passively tolerated obvious expenditures of their assessment monies to support this private business who is trespassing on their common property, contrary to the Covenants. The encroachment on Members' rights came to some kind of head when MANBOD attempted to enact a mandatory assessment IN FAVOR of this business. This kind of attack on Owners accelerated President Kn Lws's tenure as president supported by 8 other directors. Only one director voted NO on any motion proposing limits on the mandatory assessment and that was Peet Brdun, but he also failed to do his fiduciary duty by opposing on behalf of Members' interests. There was no discussion introduced by Peet on "the dark side of the coin". Peet's lone "no" vote was but a whimper of protest and, in a court of law, Peet could actually look worse than the other 8 directors.
Soon after the botched ballot, KL resigned from the BOD with an excuse of "stress". If you believe that was the real reason, you may also want to revisit the Board meeting where aliens were introduced, entitled "Martians, Meteors and Macbeth", for a reminder of BOD's dubious association with truth-telling.
Later this year, we will see more secret, backdoor dealings in support of KCN by MANBOD as Mr. Steyeb expands the business, rather than what he said he intended to do right before the 2014 illegal dual ballot. Mr. Steyeb said he had health concerns and wanted OUT of the business and would cap subscribership to 2000. Mr Steyeb has since installed multiple towers that communicate with his server on Grayhackle. Does that sound consistent with his publicly stated intent?
Perhaps KCN has already been sold or is in transition of turnover to new ownership?
When will Members have enough of the lying and duplicity being perpetrated by the *triumvirate in power--+BOD+KCN?
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Aug 16, 2014 13:33:09 GMT -5
No. In Florida statutory law, there are only 3 Common Interest Development (CID) entities: Homeowners Association, Condominium and Cooperative. There is no such thing as a resort community for purposes of law.
Title companies look for all documents in which claims, encumbrances and title interest is recorded in the public record. They don't really care what you call it. We could also call it IT-ville.
"Resort community" can referred to by the Declarant or or MANBOD or KCN to mean anything it wants. It is casually referred to as a "resort community" but that is meaningless as to legal status. The plat status is "recreational vehicle community" and the legal status is "homeowners association" and its corporate status is not-for-profit.
In the case of S-bag, the Declarant named S-bag a "recreational vehicle community"--not a resort community. This is named on every deed of conveyance and is up to the Developer to describe the plat use according to the County-approved PUD.
|
|
|
|
Post by Confused? on Aug 16, 2014 14:09:45 GMT -5
No. In Florida statutory law, there are only 3 Common Interest Development (CID) entities: Homeowners Association, Condominium and Cooperative. There is no such thing as a resort community for purposes of law. Title companies look for all documents in which claims, encumbrances and title interest is recorded in the public record. They don't really care what you call it. We could also call it IT-ville. "Resort community" can be referred to by the Declarant or or MANBOD or KCN to mean anything it wants. It is casually referred to as a "resort community" but that is meaningless as to legal status. The plat status is "recreational vehicle community" and the legal status is "homeowners association" and its corporate status is "not for profit". In the case of S-bag, the Declarant named S-bag a "recreational vehicle community"--not a resort community. This is named on every deed of conveyance and is up to the Developer to describe the plat use according to the County-approved PUD. I am confused, when Stmbg Ixx Inc. first came into SLR his representative Monty Haskins said that since we have "resort status" that we must have a management company in order to "Excecute your Reserves". I was confused when many people started clapping. We had to hire a company to spend our reserves because we call our community a "Resort"? But its only in name and not anything else? This isn't making any sense. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Aug 16, 2014 20:25:16 GMT -5
Mr Monty was 'mistaken'. There is no meaningful condition as "resort status" ; there are only HOA's, condos or coops that have recreational amenities, which can range from a BBQ pit to a full recreational complex. Recreational status is meaningless except to those who want to describe an amenity package as such.
People who mindlessly clap are generally passive, gullible and not eager to question the status quo or scrutinze "authority" statements as to their having any basis in fact.
No need to be confused--just be skeptical of any statement that comes from MANBOD and determine the facts for yourself.
|
|
