|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 30, 2014 15:27:46 GMT -5
Reported this morning that Peet Brdun was asked by an owner "Are the covenants expired?". Peet's answer? "No, we are just revitalizing". What?  Owners who want to know answers should, at this point, seek the counsel of their own attorney. It is pretty obvious you are not going to get the truth out of this board, as evidenced by the *inane response above. * inane adj stupid absurd asinine daft empty fatuous flat foolish frivolous futile harebrained idiotic illogical imbecilic innocuous insipid jejune laughable meaningless mindless pointless puerile ridiculous sappy senseless silly trifling unintelligent vacant vacuous vain vapid weak wishy-washy worthless Here is a nice list of adjectives which will come in handy in the future to describe the actions and statements of the board directors. |
|
Im Trying
Addict
" Chillin-Out " One Day At A Time !
Posts: 143
|
Post by Im Trying on Dec 30, 2014 22:31:21 GMT -5
I truly believe that is his take on this issue. The Group does not have any Marbles left, they have lost them all. So Sad...
|
|
|
|
Post by pestcontrol on Dec 30, 2014 23:04:13 GMT -5
Reported this morning that Peet Brdun was asked by an owner "Are the covenants expired?". Peet's answer? "No, we are just revitalizing". What? Owners who want to know answers should, at this point, seek the counsel of their own attorney. It is pretty obvious you are not going to get the truth out of this board, as evidenced by the *inane response above. For a group who goes around flying the American flag and purporting: "Love of God and Country " you surely do not take citizenship into account. How can you desecrate your country by flagrantly abusing your power for your own ego and NOT speak and act for everyone when almost everyone within S-bag is yelling STOP.
We have lost our trust in each of you. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 31, 2014 4:46:50 GMT -5
So...let's see if I got this right.
Peet et al deny that SLohA covenants are expired--but at the same time--have hired Management Company's attorneys at hundreds of dollars for Each attorney for Each hour--to read through about 60 documents per subdivision and cause new revitalization document packages to be prepared, assembled and mailed to Each Member and lienholder. After the Notice period, said attorneys will construct ballots for Each subdivision, mail out the necessary materials to Each Member, poll the Members and certify the results for Each subdivision. If one or more of the three revitalized packages are passed by at least 50% of the Members in Each subdivision, the approved package(s) will be re-tooled for submission to the FL state oversight office for review. Following a presumably favorable outcome, this expensive group of attorneys will provide statutory notice to all members and lienholders of the revitalized documents and effect public recording.
Cost: anyone's guess but mine is (conservatively) $50,000.
And we are doing all that as a Strategy for lawsuits at Management Company's lawyers recommendation?
SLohA is spending this money despite Peet's belief that the Covenants are not really expired??! And, Members are not permitted to know any of the details of said strategy and benefit of this monumentally-expensive venture!
Said another way, BOD asserts that SLohA currently has 100% of all Members encumbered by Covenants, but we are revitalizing the original Covenants to settle TWO lawsuits--one of which was initiated by the BOD--and that will reduce parcel encumbrance by at least 50% (and most likely higher due to opt-out homesteads)!
Is there a director in La-La Land or could this be the actual level of competence of this Board?
A promise to Peet et al--when the revitalization packages come out, they will be microscopically examined for accuracy and adherence to the originals. Any deviation from the originals will be formally cH allenged here and in Tallahassee, if needed. I will do a "first pass" reading since I have the docs nearly-memorized by now. Frd O'N eel (Attny), Attorney for Owners, will be involved.
Q: BOD: "What does this mean to you?"
A: It means no Board-sponsored phoney-baloney amendments, no Board-approved trumped up rules, no Board-deleted Bylaws! Suggest you instruct MANBOD attorneys accordingly and avoid an expensive cH allenge and associated fallout (like a complete redo of the above and $50,000 Times 2).
Your gang has strayed waaaay too far from the sidewalk and anything you or your agents say or do will be met with skepticism and vigorous legal scrutiny.
|
|
Anonymous Environmentalist
Guest
|
Post by Anonymous Environmentalist on Jan 2, 2015 8:20:58 GMT -5
I was reading our Jan. 2015 issue of the S-Bag Express Newsletter, and I read something our president said that really bothers me, perhaps it will bother other readers as well. It is on page 16 that SLohA's president states:
"I would also like to thank the board for their continued efforts no matter the fallout as we are working in the best interests of the Association."
They are going to have a lot more "fallout" than they ever bargained for and it will come from NOT working in SLohA's best interests.
|
|
