Organizing Committee "Revitalization Chat"

Gee it didn't take long for word to get out about no post for Monday mtg. Just got a call from 499 about Monday mtg. after Koffee Klatch. Wow!!!

Looks Like, Same Old, Same Old....

 WE NEED CHANGE IN LEADERSHIP IN SLohA!

Cross Post from Board Progress of Lawsuit and Interrogatories
Lra posted:


I am still assimilating this disorganized circus event of a meeting, starting with the Ringleader and Public Relations Barker Master of Ceremonies, Mik Lanoose.  And then the Parade of Power to the Podium--FOUR FREAKING ATTORNEYS!   Now comes the obviously-planned interruption of the business meeting to sell public relations advertisements i.e. tee shirts and stickers  with

 Attachment Deleted    "I Heart SLR" etc..  During sticker/tee shirt sales, we paid for about an hour of billable attorney time--that's 15 minutes for sales time FOUR attorneys!   And not a Board Director Officer in sight--one on a cruise and the rest just absent for the most critically important piece of business ever in the history of S-bag!  Dbag was the only director present.  (He apparently hadn't scheduled a golf or poker game.) Wow!  How much do ya think that Dog 'n Pony Show Cost?? 

The meeting ended with leery listerine's embarassingly coy question "Can I hand out more "I Heart SLR" stickers for free?"  Wait for it....<<WILD THUNDEROUS CLAPPING!>> 

Leaving, I filed through the line to pick up my very own "I Heart SLR" sticker;  it was offered and I accepted it.  The lady recognized me and said something like "Oh NOooo..YOU can't have one" and then lunged at my sticker.  Instinctively, I recoiled at her aggression and anger and she continued to repeatedly grab the sticker from me.  I hung onto it and she had her hands all over my hands and lower arms trying to take her sticker away from me.  I finally won the sticker wrestling contest, smoothed out my wrinkled and torn up "I Heart SLR" and said to her "Don't you ever put your hands on me, Woman!"  She did not acknowledge me and I moved closer and said in a much louder voice "I SAID DON'T YOU EVER PUT YOUR HANDS ON ME AGAIN-WOMAN!"

(Someone later told me it was a woman (not a lady) named "Shirley".)

There were about a dozen people in line and many more standing around, so there were plenty of onlookers to this tussle.  (Curiously, this was the second physical struggle for paper I have experienced in the last two months--the first was Director Alc Nttr attempting to take back the Deficiency Report I wrote at the Records Inspection!)

Went home and had a glass of wine...

Much more to think about and post, including the complete audio and perhaps some audio snippets of lies and deceptions.

What ever happen to The Revitalization Committee and the BODs in SLR. Why is this matter being Pigeon Holed ?

Is this also privileged information Mr. President?

Dick Tracy posted:

The Organizing Committee is just doing what the Board tells it to do and the Board is following the lead of the Attorney, (unless it is letting chips fall).  It was the ATTORNEY that made the mistake on the Ballot/Consent form.  Because it was such a monster mistake, SLohA's agreement to redo the form was written as a specific provision of the mediation.  It should be the Attorney that pays for repackaging and remailing all the revite kits and corrected Consent Forms.  Let's call them what they are; another apparent dual "ballot" that does not give a choice to Vote NO and refuse to consent i.e. all choices were not offered to an informed membership who were unaware they were "consenting" to revitalized use restrictions on their land by signing the form even if they voted NO to Revitalization.  It was a Gotcha CONSENT form and is a valid consent even without either vote selected! 

My attorney advised NOT to sign the green sheet.  Without his advice, I might have voted YES to revitalization in concept and not signed the Consenting Signature section.   By doing so, my form would have been thrown away as an invalid (unsigned) "vote".  Thus, the only possible valid ballots were YES and Consent or NO and Consent.  There was no Option to Vote NO/No Consent or YES/No  Consent.

Simply stated, if you did not want to be revitalized and voted NO, you were also consenting to being encumbered by an approved revitalization by signing the Ballot form.  The correct instruction would be  "If you do not want to be revitalized, if approved, throw the green sheet away."

I hope the Committee does a better job next time around of informing Owners about the significance of signing the form.  
I hope Owners' are paying attention to what is happening to their private property rights in  S-bag and don't sign anything without extreme caution and due diligence. 
And I hope someone will make a records request to inspect the next batch of Consent forms submitted by Owners.  "Trust"...but verify."