Post by Admin on Oct 17, 2013 19:30:02 GMT -5
Cross-post from AnonNews
September 19, 2013
An Offer to Participate in Presuit Mediation has been mailed to BOD. They have 20 days to accept the offer; the settlement conference will be scheduled with the mediator within the following 90 days.
The MRTA website has a summary and images of the paperwork @ slrmarta.webs.com
October 3, 2013
SLohA has agreed to participate in pre-suit mediation. It will be scheduled within the next 90 days.
______________________________________________
October 4, 2013
SLohA "wrote in" its selection for a mediation agent: Neal O'Toole out of Bartow. Here are the areas of expertise listed on the Certified Mediator website for Middle District of Florida:
Business Litigation, Contracts, Insurance, Personal Injury, Products Liability, Professional Liability, Real Property
The 5 lawyers suggested by my attorney in the "Offer to Participate" are all specially knowledgable and qualified in the application of MRTA in title disputes; these attorneys were all rejected by SLohA. Maybe there is another type of qualification sought by SLohA rather than expertise in MRTA law? Maybe Mr. O'Toole is a really, really good negotiator!
________________________________________________________
SLohA's selection for a mediation agent, may just back-fire....
__________________________________________________________
October 5, 2013
Bod will try and bluff their way out of this, how has that worked for them so far ?
_________________________________________________
I'd have my attorney thoroughly check out this Tool's background--I bet that "our" bored of dicktaters have some sort of pre-negotiated back-room deal they presented to him to get what they want out of this mediation meeting; since they are all liars and sharks here feeding at the same table, what else could you possibly expect? And to have turned down 5 other competent attorneys suggested by resident's atty. seems like they already knew who they wanted since they no doubt have this tool guy in their pocket...
_______________________________________________________
maybe they're buying the answer they want with an envelope full of someone else's Ben Franklins
_________________________________________________________________
There is no doubt that SLohA's rejection of the 5 MRTA-qualified attorneys suggested by my attorney was purposeful and energized by motives that SLohA believes will benefit SLohA. Perhaps the intent is to stalemate the mediation. Self-interest on both sides is as it should be; after all, the MRTA-qualified attorney-mediators would have been advantageous to me because they have a practiced and comprehensive understanding of the statute underlying the Slander of Suit complaint.
In the end, the choice of mediator makes no difference as neither party is bound by the mediation just by agreeing to participate. There might have been a chance of progressing the conversation if SLohA had selected an attorney who was as knowledgeable about MRTA as he is about slip 'n falls and vehicular/medical injuries. This is regrettable but not surprising. And who knows, Mr. O'Toole might brush up on MRTA in preparation for the meeting.
Here is link to Mr O'Toole's website :
www.loblawyers.com/about/lawyers/neal-l-otoole/
September 19, 2013
An Offer to Participate in Presuit Mediation has been mailed to BOD. They have 20 days to accept the offer; the settlement conference will be scheduled with the mediator within the following 90 days.
The MRTA website has a summary and images of the paperwork @ slrmarta.webs.com
October 3, 2013
SLohA has agreed to participate in pre-suit mediation. It will be scheduled within the next 90 days.
______________________________________________
October 4, 2013
SLohA "wrote in" its selection for a mediation agent: Neal O'Toole out of Bartow. Here are the areas of expertise listed on the Certified Mediator website for Middle District of Florida:
Business Litigation, Contracts, Insurance, Personal Injury, Products Liability, Professional Liability, Real Property
The 5 lawyers suggested by my attorney in the "Offer to Participate" are all specially knowledgable and qualified in the application of MRTA in title disputes; these attorneys were all rejected by SLohA. Maybe there is another type of qualification sought by SLohA rather than expertise in MRTA law? Maybe Mr. O'Toole is a really, really good negotiator!
________________________________________________________
SLohA's selection for a mediation agent, may just back-fire....
__________________________________________________________
October 5, 2013
Bod will try and bluff their way out of this, how has that worked for them so far ?
_________________________________________________
I'd have my attorney thoroughly check out this Tool's background--I bet that "our" bored of dicktaters have some sort of pre-negotiated back-room deal they presented to him to get what they want out of this mediation meeting; since they are all liars and sharks here feeding at the same table, what else could you possibly expect? And to have turned down 5 other competent attorneys suggested by resident's atty. seems like they already knew who they wanted since they no doubt have this tool guy in their pocket...
_______________________________________________________
maybe they're buying the answer they want with an envelope full of someone else's Ben Franklins
_________________________________________________________________
There is no doubt that SLohA's rejection of the 5 MRTA-qualified attorneys suggested by my attorney was purposeful and energized by motives that SLohA believes will benefit SLohA. Perhaps the intent is to stalemate the mediation. Self-interest on both sides is as it should be; after all, the MRTA-qualified attorney-mediators would have been advantageous to me because they have a practiced and comprehensive understanding of the statute underlying the Slander of Suit complaint.
In the end, the choice of mediator makes no difference as neither party is bound by the mediation just by agreeing to participate. There might have been a chance of progressing the conversation if SLohA had selected an attorney who was as knowledgeable about MRTA as he is about slip 'n falls and vehicular/medical injuries. This is regrettable but not surprising. And who knows, Mr. O'Toole might brush up on MRTA in preparation for the meeting.
Here is link to Mr O'Toole's website :
www.loblawyers.com/about/lawyers/neal-l-otoole/