Post by Admin on Apr 29, 2015 8:16:20 GMT -5
There were two meetings; the Feb 4 was a Special Meeting to discuss the Owner petition on BOATS. It was decided to postpone this meeting and hold a SECOND SPECIAL MEETING later in the month.
This meeting appears to have been about the covenants' revision and was called a "workshop". PoSt age to Canada for the ballots was discussed. There was more discussed that needed to be run by the attorney and an appointment was set. The issue(s) requiring an attorney meeting was not identified and there are no minutes of the Special Meeting with the attorney.
ExhibitDSpMtgMinFeb4_1986pg1.pdf (30.15 KB)
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The Meeting on Feb 19 is the Regular meeting.
ExhibitDMinFeb19_1986pg1.pdf (49.13 KB)
ExhibitDMinFeb19_1986pg2.pdf (52.28 KB)
ExhibitDMinFeb19_1986pg3.pdf (45.53 KB)
Secretary read correspondence from Owners who expressed concerns about revisions to Covenants i.e. non-highlighting of changes, Board's recommendation of approval appearing on the ballot, delay in distribution of Ballots due to printing error, Owners who did not receive the corrected ballot with the revised Covenant. Secretary referred to a 1980 letter that these things did not invalidate the Ballot and a current attorney opinion that there were no "irregularities" on the ballot. Secretary strongly urged members to accept the revised Covenants.
Board adopted Robber's Rules for conduct of business meetings in orderly and consistent manner.
Board adopted a proposal by a private concrete operator Joe Yates & Assoc. to lease site #76 in Storage area to build large concrete pad and store concrete materials. Motion passed 5/3.
No operator found yet for Trading Post; postponed.
Board requested that ALL activities cease during a board meeting. No action taken.
US PostMaster will meet with Board to discuss making SLohA a contract post office and they will train interested parties.
Owner Q & A: Owner expressed concern that Ballot for revised changes did not indicate in clear terms what people were voting on. BOD responded by saying that people knew what they were voting on.
This meeting appears to have been about the covenants' revision and was called a "workshop". PoSt age to Canada for the ballots was discussed. There was more discussed that needed to be run by the attorney and an appointment was set. The issue(s) requiring an attorney meeting was not identified and there are no minutes of the Special Meeting with the attorney.
ExhibitDSpMtgMinFeb4_1986pg1.pdf (30.15 KB)
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The Meeting on Feb 19 is the Regular meeting.
ExhibitDMinFeb19_1986pg1.pdf (49.13 KB)
ExhibitDMinFeb19_1986pg2.pdf (52.28 KB)
ExhibitDMinFeb19_1986pg3.pdf (45.53 KB)
Secretary read correspondence from Owners who expressed concerns about revisions to Covenants i.e. non-highlighting of changes, Board's recommendation of approval appearing on the ballot, delay in distribution of Ballots due to printing error, Owners who did not receive the corrected ballot with the revised Covenant. Secretary referred to a 1980 letter that these things did not invalidate the Ballot and a current attorney opinion that there were no "irregularities" on the ballot. Secretary strongly urged members to accept the revised Covenants.
Board adopted Robber's Rules for conduct of business meetings in orderly and consistent manner.
Board adopted a proposal by a private concrete operator Joe Yates & Assoc. to lease site #76 in Storage area to build large concrete pad and store concrete materials. Motion passed 5/3.
No operator found yet for Trading Post; postponed.
Board requested that ALL activities cease during a board meeting. No action taken.
US PostMaster will meet with Board to discuss making SLohA a contract post office and they will train interested parties.
Owner Q & A: Owner expressed concern that Ballot for revised changes did not indicate in clear terms what people were voting on. BOD responded by saying that people knew what they were voting on.