Post by Admin on Dec 30, 2015 13:58:21 GMT -5
Admin posted:
This sort of thing is happening with increasing frequency and oddly, happened again shortly after the above was posted. An owner was overheard in the front office loudly talking to Chap and Shn. Owner was extremely agitated. Apparently, Shn had phoned the owner's contractor and informed the contractor that it would not be admitted to the park. The contractor was a guest of the owner. Owner had a business relationship with the contractor which was disrupted and harmed by this action. Chap claimed it was a miscommunication. Chap is not even very good at backpeddling his misstatements. Is Chap being instructed to disrupt business transactions at the behest of the Board--or is he taking it upon himself to stir up trouble and provoke another lawsuit? Is the Management Company not properly training this new licensee?
Both the Owner and the Contractor can bring a complaint against SLohA. The contractor will not want to work in a hostile environment and may have lost a job worth thousands of dollars to his business. His business reputation has been maligned without basis by S-bag. Contractor has been harmed by S-bag which injured its reputation in the business community. S-bag inserted itself in an ongoing business relationship between the Owner and Contractor without cause or authority. The owners may or may not be able to repair the relationship but, if so, it will be at the cost of personal distress, construction delays and possibly higher costs of going to a higher bid contractor.
Chap, are you crazy? Owner property is private and you have absolutely no business sticking your nose in anything owners want to do with the property as long as they get a Polk permit. Even when Covenants were active, there was never architectural authority over private parcels. I advised you about this personally before I filed a police report on you for stealing and hiding my property.
Board, if you are supporting this kind of thing, same question to you and one more: Are you looking for more lawsuits?
This has been happening with some regularity and Chap may have just pulled the tail of the tiger this time. I recently reported him to police for stealing my property and the property of 13 owners. Another owner stated Chap had done essentially the same thing as above when they were trying to get some concrete poured. One of the parties reportedly sought legal help and the standoff got resolved somehow. Chap told another owner that their shed was in the setback and they told him to take a hike. I know of at least one more owner whose contractor was pouring a driveway and Chap decided to interfere. He stopped work by one owner's tree trimming contractor. (I would have called the police immediately if he interfered with my hired workers.) Smart owners are just ignoring Chap.
I am told that SLohA/Chap now has a new or additional permission form for people to sign which "cannot leave the office". He was seen approaching an owner's door holding a pink paper. I hope that is a rumor; I have not yet seen this form. Has anyone?
(Board has been courting another lawsuit by pretending there are rules and intimidating owners who want to modify their lots. I knew there was trouble when they established the "limited" Architectural Committee whose only purpose was to assist owners with setting up new units. LEGAL Architectural authority MUST be in the Covenants. Board has no legal basis to defend SLohA against an Owner's legal complaint of say..interference in a business transaction such as Owner-Contractor relative to Polk-permitted use of private property. Warm up your wallets!)
Both the Owner and the Contractor can bring a complaint against SLohA. The contractor will not want to work in a hostile environment and may have lost a job worth thousands of dollars to his business. His business reputation has been maligned without basis by S-bag. Contractor has been harmed by S-bag which injured its reputation in the business community. S-bag inserted itself in an ongoing business relationship between the Owner and Contractor without cause or authority. The owners may or may not be able to repair the relationship but, if so, it will be at the cost of personal distress, construction delays and possibly higher costs of going to a higher bid contractor.
Chap, are you crazy? Owner property is private and you have absolutely no business sticking your nose in anything owners want to do with the property as long as they get a Polk permit. Even when Covenants were active, there was never architectural authority over private parcels. I advised you about this personally before I filed a police report on you for stealing and hiding my property.
Board, if you are supporting this kind of thing, same question to you and one more: Are you looking for more lawsuits?
This has been happening with some regularity and Chap may have just pulled the tail of the tiger this time. I recently reported him to police for stealing my property and the property of 13 owners. Another owner stated Chap had done essentially the same thing as above when they were trying to get some concrete poured. One of the parties reportedly sought legal help and the standoff got resolved somehow. Chap told another owner that their shed was in the setback and they told him to take a hike. I know of at least one more owner whose contractor was pouring a driveway and Chap decided to interfere. He stopped work by one owner's tree trimming contractor. (I would have called the police immediately if he interfered with my hired workers.) Smart owners are just ignoring Chap.
I am told that SLohA/Chap now has a new or additional permission form for people to sign which "cannot leave the office". He was seen approaching an owner's door holding a pink paper. I hope that is a rumor; I have not yet seen this form. Has anyone?
